The setting-up of this website was financially
supported by the European
Union within the European Commission’s Sixth Framework Programme from
1 January 2005 until 28 February 2007.
The European Commission and other EU agencies are not responsible for the content.
|
See what’s what.
Please note that the GMO Compass Database currently is being expanded and updated. Please check back for new entries.
|
|
 |
News Messages |
| 30 October 2007 | | France: Sarkozy to suspend cultivation of Bt Maize | | The President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, has announced the temporary suspension of cultivation approval for genetically modified Bt maize. No further action will be taken before assessments are conducted by an expert commission, which shortly will be constituted. At the conclusion of the Grenelle environnement, a broad-scale national discussion of future French environmental policy, Sarkozy stated that he had come to this decision based on the precautionary principle. The president also stated that no long-term ban of genetically modified plants is planned and that no restrictions will be applied to research in this area.
The cultivation of Bt maize MON810 is approved throughout the EU. The EU Commission repeatedly has declared national bans to be illegitimate, since no new scientific evidence is available that places doubt on the environmental or product safety of MON810. During a visit to Paris, EU Agricultural Commissioner Mariann Fischer Boel declared that France clearly violates the EU Treaty. Boel also stated that, in the case of its implementation of a cultivation ban on a GM plant approved in the EU, France must reckon with a negative judgement from the European Court. |
| 26 October 2007 | | GM Trees: New Weapons Against Pollution | Scientists at the University of Washington have succeeded in developing genetically engineered poplar trees that can break down a
host of highly toxic industrial pollutants into harmless by-products.
The use of plants to clean up environmental contamination, known as
phytoremediation, is emerging as an increasingly appealing way to clean up industrial messes. Previously, phytoremediation approaches have been limited because problem areas often are contaminated with more than one toxic chemical. Not only can these poplars handle multiple hydrocarbon contaminants including chloroform, benzene, and trichloroethylene but also metabolise the pollutants into small amounts of water, carbon dioxide, and harmless salts.
The lab studies showed that the poplars were 100 times better than their unmodified counterparts at removing trichloroethylene. The trees also were effective at taking in pollutants from the air and breaking them down in their leaves.
The next step is to see how the trees perform in the field. Initial experiments will make sure that the trees themselves have no unintended negative effects on insects and wildlife. The researchers also have proposed ways to prevent the trees from spreading into natural environments.
In the future, these poplars may be planted at selected sites plagued by polluted runoff from petroleum refineries or from the production of plastics. |
| 26 October 2007 | | EU Environment Commissioner against cultivation approval for GM maize | The European Environment Commissioner, Stavros Dimas, has spoken out against the approval of two genetically modified maize lines for cultivation in the EU. His opinions address the Bt11 maize developed by Syngenta as well as the 1507 maize developed by Pioneer Hi-Bred to combine resistance to insects and herbicides.
Both applications had been pending for years. After assessment of the products by the European Food Safety Authority, the Commission currently is preparing a recommended decision. Dimas explained his negative attitude towards the maize lines by stating first that “possible long-term risks to the environment and biodiversity are not completely known” and, secondly, that “environmental effects resulting from the cultivation of the GM maize lines are unacceptable”. Within the Commission, Dimas appears to be isolated in regard to this question. According to a report by the Reuters news agency, all other representatives in the 27-member Commission expressed disagreement with Dimas on the issue.
A spokesperson from Pioneer declared the concerns raised by Dimas to be unfounded. EFSA experts in January 2005 already had pronounced 1507 maize to be exactly as safe as conventional maize. Since the Commission repeatedly has postponed the due decision on approval, Pioneer submitted a legal complaint in May. |
| 19 October 2007 | | Pakistan: Unapproved cultivation of Bt cotton | | In Pakistan, genetically modified Bt cotton apparently is being cultivated on a large scale. According to a report by the Embassy of the USA, approximately 40 per cent of the Pakistani cotton harvest is gathered from Bt cotton types. Bt cotton is not approved in Pakistan.
It may be suspected that the affected seeds are smuggled into the country from India, China and Australia. In China and India, the cultivation of Bt cotton has increased significantly in the last years and is responsible for roughly one half of the cotton production of these countries.
The Pakistani government has announced its intention to facilitate the commercial use of genetically modified cotton. Furthermore, the administration recommends the local development of GM lines that are suited to the prevailing climatic conditions and that possess resistance to pests and diseases common to the region. The development and field testing of such GM cotton types may require years.
Pakistan harvests approximately 2.4 billion tonnes of cotton per year. According to estimates, almost 900,000 tonnes are produced with Bt lines.
|
| 17 October 2007 | | EU Member States: Chronic blockade of decisions on GM products | | The EU Member States continue to be deeply divided on the approval of GM products. On 10th October, this was shown once again by the results of a vote in the Standing Committee in Brussels: all four current applications did not receive the qualified majority from Member States necessary for approval.
The subjects of the applications included animal feed produced from the Amflora potato developed by BASF to contain a modified starch composition. This potato is intended for exclusive use in providing raw material for the starch industry. In order to make use of resulting industrial by-products as fodder, BASF had applied additionally for approval of the potato as animal feed. Based on the safety assessment of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA), the EU Commission recommended the approval. As intended by BASF, use of the potato as foodstuff for human consumption would remain unapproved – with the exception of accidental admixtures below the threshold of 0.9 per cent. In the following weeks, the EU Commission will decide upon the approval of the Amflora potato for cultivation.
Three other applications for the import of GM maize and its use as food and feed also remained without a qualified majority. The applications refer to hybrids of the GM maize lines MON863, MON810 and NK603, all of which already are approved in the EU. Consequently, the Council of Ministers for Agriculture assumes responsibility for a decision. However, this council also may make a decision only in the case of a qualified majority of Member States.
|
| 15 October 2007 | | USA: Official investigation of LL601 rice complete | | The official investigation conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture USDA on the presence of genetically modified LL601 rice in conventional rice products has been concluded. In the summer of 2006, traces of unapproved LL601 rice were found first in the USA and subsequently also in probes of US long grain rice in Europe. The herbicide-resistant LL601 (Liberty Link) rice was developed by the agro-biotech concern Aventis – now known as Bayer CropScience – and was subject to field tests in the 1990s. However, its development was discontinued in favour of the similar LL62 rice.
In the context of the UDSA investigation, almost 400 probes were checked from the harvest years of 2002 through 2006. LL601 was proven to be present exclusively in the Cheniere cultivar. In the Clearfield 131 cultivar, traces were found of a further GM rice line identified as LL604. Probes taken from all other rice cultivars remained without result. The UDSA experts were nonetheless unable to determine the ultimate cause of the unintended admixture. Cheniere and LL601 rice both were grown on the compound of the Rice Research Station in Crowley, Louisiana and it is possible that crossing occurred between plants of both cultivars. Clearfield and LL604 rice also were propagated on this site, albeit in different years. This situation precludes the possibility of their crossing.
Punitive measures will not be undertaken against Bayer CropScience, since no fault of the company may be proven. On the basis of the UDSA investigation, new recommendations for better quality control in seed production will be formulated. Such recommendations include increasing the distance between propagation fields of GM and conventional lines.
|
| 11 October 2007 | | The future of GMOs in France under debate | Rules for the usage of GMOs in France might become tougher according to recent environment discussions in the country. The “Grenelle de l’environnement”, a current large-scale, four-month French forum on environmental issues organised by the French government, is aimed at providing a stage for the development of national environmental policies including the future regulations of GM crops.
Basic changes in French agricultural policy appear likely. A working group on GMOs has suggested new legislation oriented towards transparency and towards the freedom of choice for farmers and for consumers. Such laws also would regulate coexistence more strictly and enact the ‘causer’ principle, under which users of GMOs retain ultimate responsibility for the control of their crops. Announcements of environment minister Jean-Louis Borloo considering even a ban on the usage of GM seeds had caused an outrage among farmers’, seed producers’ and grain processors’ organisations. Yet, after their protests, this issue does not appear in the final working group proposals.
Further suggestions by the working group include increased research on biotechnology and its effects, as well as the establishment of an independent national advisory body.
New agricultural policies may exert influence even beyond French borders. French representatives to the Council of Ministers abstained from voting on the EU import approval of three GM maize lines in September, and French veto could hinder current negotiations on the extension of approval for MON810 maize. MON810 is the only GM maize approved to date for cultivation in the EU.
During October, public consultations will take place in 15 cities throughout France and on the internet. President Nicolas Sarkozy is expected to announce by the end of October the government’s conclusions on national positions and administrative plans regarding biotechnology. |
|
|
XML News Feed
| Merge the latest news messages from GMO-Compass in shortened form onto your news reader or web log. | | GMO-Compass news feeds use XML formatting and require RSS 2.0 (really simple syndication). This standard format allows diverse applications to easily exchange and integrate data from the internet. |
|