GMO COMPASS - Information on genetically modified organisms
  Feb 9, 2010 | 3:47 pm
Site Search
Searches all of GMO-Compass in an instant
The setting-up of this website was financially supported by the European Union within the European Commission’s Sixth Framework Programme from 1 January 2005 until 28 February 2007.

The European Commission and other EU agencies are not responsible for the content.
See what’s what.
The GMO Food Database
The GMO Food Database.
You want to know for which food products or plants gene technology plays a role?

Then enter here the name of a plant, foodstuff, ingredient or additive:

Database search
All database entries in overview:
Plants
Foodstuffs
Ingredients and additives
Additives according to E numbers
Enzymes


Please note that the GMO Compass Database currently is being expanded and updated. Please check back for new entries.

Newsletter
Sign up to receive regular updates on GM food quality and safety.
To change or cancel your subscription, please enter your email above.
Contact
Comments, suggestions or questions?
Please contact us at info@gmo-compass.org
Change font size
1 2 3

News Messages


April 2007 May 2007 June 2007
25 May 2007
Bt toxin in MON810 within natural level of variation

In a study, Greenpeace found great variations in the Bt toxin content in the genetically modified maize MON810 and has claimed that the legal basis for the EU approval has not been fulfilled. However, prior scientific analyses by a German research group, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) contradict these findings and conclusions.

In 2006, Greenpeace took samples of 600 leaves from Bt maize MON810 in German and Spanish fields. They found the content of the Bt toxin, a plant-produced insecticide, to be lower than expected and to have variations between 0.1 and more than 10 µg/g. One month before the release of the Greenpeace report, German researchers published results from a three-year study that confirmed low Bt toxin levels, albeit with much smaller variations which remained within natural levels.

Project leader Johannes Jehle of the DLR in Neustadt/Weinstrasse stated, "Despite the lower Bt concentrations and the observed variations between plant individuals, our results corroborate the known findings of earlier studies and do not tally with the Greenpeace measurements."

GMO-Safety interview with Johannes Jehle
Greenpeace study
24 May 2007
New GM plant could make biofuels cheaper

US researchers have developed genetically modified maize varieties that have the promise to make biofuel ethanol production more cost-effective and efficient. Scientists could turn leaves and stalks into products that are as valuable as the kernels.

Currently, most US ethanol is made from maize kernels, because breaking down the cellulose in maize leaves and stalks into sugars for ethanol fermentation is difficult and expensive. Together with colleagues, Mariam Sticklen, professor at Michigan State University, now has succeeded in creating two maize crop varieties that contain the enzymes necessary to break down the cellulose in their leaves into simple sugars. The trick was to prevent the enzymes from becoming active while the plant is still alive. Researchers therefore used enzymes that are naturally found in bacteria living in hot springs and that only are active when the GM maize is heated to 50 °C.

"In the future, maize growers will be able to sell their maize stalks and leaves as well as their grain for ethanol production", Sticklen stated in a press statement. "What is now a waste product will become an economically viable commodity."

However, before the new maize line may be commercialised, it must first be tested for its environmental safety in order to ensure that the transgenic plants have no negative environmental effects.

Michigan State University press release
24 May 2007
Swiss scientists plan new field trials

Researchers at the University of Zurich and at the Federal Institute of Technology in Switzerland plan field experiments with genetically modified wheat. Tied in with similar research conducted in 2004, the experiments would form part of a planned national research programme.

The new projects would study the outcrossing behaviour of GM wheat and compare its growth in the lab to its growth in the field. Beat Keller, a lead researcher on the project, commented, "We want to find out if GM wheat plants that we have already tested in the labs, which show improved resistance to fungal diseases, also behave in a similar way in the field in normal agricultural environments." Impacts on soil organisms and insects would be another focus of research.

GMOs continue to be highly contentious in Switzerland. The last field trials in Switzerland were conducted in 2004 and caused major protests and lengthy legal debates. In 2005, the Swiss voted for a five-year moratorium on the cultivation of GM crops until a national research programme delivers new insights into safety and coexistence of genetically modified plants. Scientific research remains permitted. "There is a clear need and demand from society to clarify questions," Beat Keller said.

The field trials would start in 2008 and continue for two years, if the Federal Environment Office agrees with the plans. A decision thereon is expected within the next three months.

GMO-Compass: GM wheat
GMO-Safety: Coexistence rules in Switzerland
23 May 2007
Brazil: GM maize to be approved shortly

In Brazil, the cultivation of GM maize is approaching. A large majority of the National Technical Biosafety Commission, CTNBio, has voted for the approval of an application from the agro-biotech company Bayer to allow the cultivation of herbicide-resistant LibertyLink maize. Before final approval by the government, the ministries will be consulted. Other companies, such as Monsanto and DuPont, also are currently preparing the market introduction of GM maize varieties.

Brazil is the third largest supplier of maize in the world. In the season 2006/2007, its maize cultivation area increased by approximately 20 percent. This growth was precipitated by high world market prices for maize due to an increased demand for biofuels.

Are GMOs Fuelling the Brazilian Future?
Countries growing GMOs
11 May 2007
ACRE report: View on GM plants not balanced

Europe should weigh benefits as well as risks when evaluating GM crops. This is the conclusion of a report by the UK Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (ACRE) on behalf of the British government.

ACRE stated that the current approval system is focused exclusively on the risks of new GM plants and completely neglects their benefits. In the case of herbicide-tolerant GM beets, for example, approval was denied due to the negative impact of the herbicide on the environment. Yet, according to the report, potential environmental benefits such as reduced herbicide use were not considered.

The report entitled “Managing the Footprint of Agriculture: Towards a Comparative Assessment of Risks and Benefits for Novel Agricultural Systems” also demands the application of a more holistic approach to any novel agricultural practice with environmental impact, especially to the use of crops for biofuels. "We could end up covering the land with crops that don't actually produce food, and that may be a problem in the future," said ACRE chairman Chris Pollock.

Full ACRE report (pdf)
11 May 2007
US ban on GM alfalfa now permanent

In February, a US district court prohibited the cultivation and marketing of a genetically modified alfalfa variety after March 30th until a new biosafety evaluation has been conducted by government authorities. A federal judge now has confirmed the decision and made the temporary US-wide ban permanent as long as the biosafety of the GM alfalfa developed by Monsanto has not been studied adequately. Monsanto officials have said that they are considering an appeal.

The US government has announced extensive assessment of the environmental safety of the GM alfalfa. USDA spokeswoman Rachel Iadicicco said that the agency would conduct the study, which may take up to two years to complete.

Some 220,000 acres of genetically engineered alfalfa were planted this year before the judge’s ban came into effect. These cultivations are not affected by the verdict, although strict requirements must be fulfilled. For example, the sites on which GM alfalfa is grown must be made public and GM and conventional alfalfa must be processed at harvest under strict separation.

10 May 2007
New conditions for the marketing of GM maize seeds in Germany

Under a new regulation, the agro-biotech company Monsanto is not allowed at the moment to market seeds of genetically modified maize MON810 in Germany. The German Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL) has informed the company that sale may resume after Monsanto has provided a monitoring plan for the observation of potential environmental effects of the GM plant. The BVL also stated that cultivation, harvest and use of MON810 maize this year nonetheless remain unaffected by the new regulation. Approved in the European Union since 1998, the insect-resistant maize MON810 is the only commercially cultivated GM plant in the region.

Under measures implemented in 2003 and aimed at detecting potential effects on the environment at an early stage, GM cultivations must be supplemented by an environmental monitoring plan. This did not apply to previously approved GM plants, including MON810, prior to the new regulation. According to news reports in Germany, the BVL has justified its decision on the basis of new scientific results that show potential environmental risks of MON810. However, a research programme funded by the German government investigated GM plants for several years and found no indications of such risks.

In a press release, Monsanto responded with the information that they are already operating a monitoring programme that fully complies with the new requirements.

The approval in the European Union for MON810 expires this year. Requirements for renewal include a comprehensive safety assessment as well as a monitoring plan, that needs to be approved by relevant authorities.

GMO database: MON810
09 May 2007
Unauthorised GM maize found in Rotterdam

According to the environmental organisation Greenpeace, genetically modified maize that has not been approved in Europe has been imported to the EU. The maize, intended for animal feed, was found in a US shipment to Rotterdam in the Netherlands.

Greenpeace analysed samples of conventional maize gluten from a ship unloading US maize. These samples contained 2.4 percent of the GM maize Herculex 59122. This maize is deregulated in the USA, but European approval is still pending and therefore imports of Herculex 59122 into the EU currently remain illegal. The European Commission has asked Dutch authorities to track down the maize shipment.

As part of the ongoing approval process, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) assessed the GM maize 59122 in March. With respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment, the Authority concluded that Herculex 59122 is as safe as its non-genetically-modified counterparts.

Greenpeace press release (Dutch)
Greenpeace press release (German)
GMO database: Bt maize 59122
09 May 2007
Bee deaths in USA and Europe: In search of the cause

Scientists in the USA and Europe are observing a dramatic spate of bee deaths. In many regions of USA, almost 90 percent of the bee population has been affected. Various reasons are suspected, including insecticides, pathogens, agricultural monocultures or too little genetic diversity within the populations.

Some environmental organisations also believe that genetically modified plants, especially the Bt maize and cotton grown on a large scale in the USA, might be the reason. However, no substantiated evidence exists to support this hypothesis. On the contrary, various scientific experts in the USA and Europe have concluded from existing findings that Bt plants are not harmful to bees. Such findings include analyses by the National Research Council (USA) and by the European Food Safety Authority. Suspicions are further contradicted by the fact that bee losses also have been observed in Switzerland, a country in which no GM plants are grown.

A US working group consisting of researchers and officials has been formed to examine the causes of the current bee death. This group will focus mainly on other hypotheses, such as the effects of new chemicals, different factors in combination, or new pathogens.

GMO Safety: Bee death - In search of the cause
GMO Safety: Bt maize compatible with bees
GMO Safety: Bees and GM plants
08 May 2007
Mexico: Agreement on the introduction of GM maize

The Mexican National Confederation of Corn Growers (CNPAMM) has signed an agreement with Monsanto on the controlled introduction of GM maize. It is aimed at allowing farmers to use the new crops without compromising the genetic resources of the country.

The agreement foresees the beginning of field trials this year to analyse potential effects of GM maize on the environment. Next year, test cultivations will be undertaken, although no seeds will be sold. If no negative effects are found, the wider cultivation of GM maize may start in Mexico in 2009.

The Mexican government had come under increasing pressure to allow GM maize plants, due to a steep increase in maize prices caused by high demand on the world markets. This had resulted in a rise in costs for maize food and food products, staples within the national diet. GM maize farming consequently is aimed at increasing the national maize production.

In Mexico, GM maize cultivations have not been allowed to date. Mexico is the country of origin of the wild grasses known as teosintes that are relatives of modern maize. Since more of these wild as well as cultivated maize species grow here than anywhere else, potential out-crossings that may compromise this biological diversity have been regarded as an issue of concern. However, experiments were unable to show that genes of the GM plants were transferred and stably established in regional varieties. Furthermore, the introduction of maize hybrid varieties in Mexico exhibits no consequences for the diversity of wild maize varieties.

03 May 2007
Farmers in the UK and in Germany are open to GM crops

New surveys suggest that fewer farmers in UK and Germany are opposed to planting genetically modified crops than is often believed. 47 percent of surveyed farmers in the UK and 33 percent in Germany are willing to cultivate GM plants. However, 16 percent in the UK and 29 percent in Germany reject the concept of GM crops, and many farmers are still undecided.

In the UK, the British Grassland Society polled its members on their attitude towards GM crops. Surprisingly, strict opposition to GMOs was expressed by responding farmers among only 16 percent, the half of whom are producing organic goods. While 47 percent generally favour GM crops, as many as three-quarters stated that they would grow GM plants if consumers were willing to buy them. Jessica Buss, director of the society, commented: "We were surprised that only one-in-eight Grassland farmers responding said that they would never grow GM forage crops."

In another survey, researchers of the University of Göttingen interviewed 370 farmers in the German north-west. The majority, 38 percent, were undecided on this issue. However, representing a fairly even split in decided attitudes, 33 percent of farmers welcomed GM crops and 29 percent rejected them.

The study also found that besides economic aspects and personal views on GMOs, many different factors are considered by farmers in their decision on GM crops.

University of Göttingen report (German)
British Grassland Society

Messages 2010
February
January
Stories
The issue of contradictory results of biosafety studies
Opposition decreasing or acceptance increasing?
An overview of European consumer polls on attitudes to GMOs
German ban on MON810 maize: will the courts now decide?
China plans to invest in GM crops R&D and consumer education
"Find the wisdom to allow GM technology to flourish"
Results of the GMO Compass snapshot poll
Genetic engineering of cut flowers
Preliminary studies raise hopes: Golden Rice works well!
GMO labelling of foodstuffs produced from animals – the discussion continues
GM Crops in Australia – will the moratoria end?
International study: consumers would buy GM products
GM plants no problem for the honey industry
Are GMOs Fuelling the Brazilian Future?
Latest Eurobarometer: Yes to Biotech – No to GM Food
Barley, Beer and Biotechnology
Farm Fresh Pharmaceuticals
Study: GM Soy Dangerous for Newborns?
Safety evaluation: GM peas in Australia with unexpected side-effects
The western corn rootworm: A pest coming to a maize field near you
Plants for the Future
XML News Feed
Merge the latest news messages from GMO-Compass in shortened form onto your news reader or web log.
GMO-Compass news feeds use XML formatting and require RSS 2.0 (really simple syndication). This standard format allows diverse applications to easily exchange and integrate data from the internet.
Download

© 2010 by GMO Compass. All rights reserved. | Imprint | website created by webmotive