GMO COMPASS - Information on genetically modified organisms
  Jan 24, 2017 | 3:55 am
Site Search

Searches all of GMO-Compass in an instant




Stakeholder input wanted: survey on research needs for assessing GMO impacts 

Shaping the Future of GMO Research

Stakeholder with interests in the risk and/or benefit assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s) are invited to take part in an online survey.

The aim of this survey is to identify which research needs should be prioritised, thereby contributing to the commissioning of research on the health, environment and economic impacts of GMOs.

The survey will close on 15th July 2015.

More information and access to the online survey

The setting-up of this website was financially supported by the European Union within the European Commission’s Sixth Framework Programme from 1 January 2005 until 28 February 2007.

The European Commission and other EU agencies are not responsible for the content.
See what’s what.
The GMO Food Database
The GMO Food Database.
You want to know for which food products or plants gene technology plays a role?

Then enter here the name of a plant, foodstuff, ingredient or additive:

Database search
All database entries in overview:
Plants
Foodstuffs
Ingredients and additives
Additives according to E numbers
Enzymes


Please note that the GMO Compass Database currently is being expanded and updated. Please check back for new entries.

Newsletter
Sign up to receive regular updates on GM food quality and safety.
To change or cancel your subscription, please enter your email above.
Contact
Comments, suggestions or questions?
Please contact us at info@gmo-compass.org
Change font size
1 2 3

Farming regulations: German Constitutional Court confirms biotech law


(25 November 2010) The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany (the BVerfG, seated in Karlsruhe) has confirmed essential stipulations of what is known as the ‘genetic engineering act’. Currently-valid restrictions on the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) plants remain in effect thereby. In 2005, the federal state of Saxony-Anhalt had filed suit against the genetic engineering act put through by the ruling federal government of the time, a coalition of Socialists and Greens.

Saxony-Anhalt had raised particular issue with the regulations on legal responsibility and on the keeping of a site register, claiming that these inappropriately hinder the cultivation of GM plants. According to the suit, such regulations are compatible neither with the freedom of employment ensured by the constitution nor with the guarantee of ownership and the concept of equality before the law.

In the decision announced on 24.11.2010, the Constitutional Court dismissed the suit and confirmed the restrictive regulations applied through the genetic engineering act to cultivation of genetically modified plants. In their legal reasoning, the judges in Karlsruhe cited “…particular duty of care in view of the fact that the state of scientific knowledge has not yet been finally established when assessing the long-term consequences of the use of genetic engineering”.

With regard to legal responsibility, regulations of the genetic engineering act remain valid therewith. According to these regulations, a farmer who sows GM plants is liable for all economic damage that results in conventional stocks through cross-pollination. This liability is binding even in the case in which the ‘GMO-farmer’ has complied with all directives and therefore bears no fault for the cross-breeding damage. In the case that no individual source of the damage may be identified, all GM-planting farmers of the affected region are collectively responsible.

Legally binding directives on best-practice procedures have existed since 2008 for the cultivation of GM plants and particularly for GM maize. According to these, a minimum distance of 150 metres is to be kept between fields of GM and conventional maize. For fields with organic maize, this distance is even increased to 300 metres.

Saxony-Anhalt also failed in its suit against the public availability of the site register. The federal state had argued that the register would provide radical opponents of gene technology with information on the precise whereabouts of fields with GM plants, which then would be vulnerable to acts of destruction.

Changes in the biotechnology law are still expected this year. In particular, federal states are expected to receive greater leeway in the determination of internal rules for the cultivation of GM plants. Before presentation of a concrete draft in relation to the issue, Minister Aigner had announced her intention of waiting for the decision of the Constitutional Court.

 

See also on GMO Compass:

 

Further information:

 

 

 

Messages 2015
April
Messages 2013
September
July
Messages 2012
October
May
Messages 2011
January
November 26, 2010 [nach oben springen]

© 2017 by GMO Compass. All rights reserved. | Imprint | website created by webmotive