GMO COMPASS - Information on genetically modified organisms
  May 22, 2012 | 5:15 pm
Site Search
Searches all of GMO-Compass in an instant
The setting-up of this website was financially supported by the European Union within the European Commission’s Sixth Framework Programme from 1 January 2005 until 28 February 2007.

The European Commission and other EU agencies are not responsible for the content.
See what’s what.
The GMO Food Database
The GMO Food Database.
You want to know for which food products or plants gene technology plays a role?

Then enter here the name of a plant, foodstuff, ingredient or additive:

Database search
All database entries in overview:
Plants
Foodstuffs
Ingredients and additives
Additives according to E numbers
Enzymes


Please note that the GMO Compass Database currently is being expanded and updated. Please check back for new entries.

Newsletter
Sign up to receive regular updates on GM food quality and safety.
To change or cancel your subscription, please enter your email above.
Contact
Comments, suggestions or questions?
Please contact us at info@gmo-compass.org
Change font size
1 2 3

Debate over GM sugar beets: US court allows planting and harvest


(17 March 2010) Farmers in the USA will be allowed to plant GM sugar beets this year as planned and also market the derived sugar. An injunction filed by several environmental groups to prohibit commercial planting immediately due to inadequate clarification of cross-pollination risks was denied by a US court.

An immediate ban on the commercial planting of GM sugar beets, which have been grown in the USA since 2007, would be economically unreasonable, said Judge Jeffrey White, of the federal district court in California. The organisations filing the injunction were too late for appropriate measures to be taken this planting season. The sugar beet seeds have already been planted, and it would not be reasonable to "pull them out of the ground or prevent the harvest from going to market."

In the USA almost all sugar beets are genetically modified. In 2009 they were planted on 475,000 hectares, producing half the US domestic sugar supply. An immediate ban on planting would have had a detrimental effect on the sugar supply and price, White said in his ruling.

Last September Judge White generally accepted the complaints of environmental and organic farmers' groups.

In a prelimimary decision he ordered the USDA to carry out an environmental impact assessment on the genetically modified beets. The plaintiffs were concerned about cross-pollination with conventional beets and related plant species such as mangold. No measures were ordered by White to be taken during the 2010 planting season. The court will now conduct a series of hearings, the first to take place in July 2010.

In the meantime, the groups are suing the USDA with the aim of retracting the authorisation granted in 2005.

"Now it has finally been clarified that farmers can plant RoundupReady sugar beets in 2010," said a spokeman for Monsanto. The company developed the genetically modified sugar beets together with the German plant breeder KWS Saat. Their resistance to the herbicidal agent Glyphosat (Roundup) allow for effective weed management.

Cross-pollination hardly plays a role in sugar beets since they flower only once every two years, and the beets are harvested after the first year. Pollen forms only if there is premature flowering (bolting) or in case of weedy beets. Cross-pollination is basically possible with wild relatives and weedy beets. In Europe wild beets are contained to just a few areas.

Commercial planting of GM sugar beets in the EU is currently not authorised. However, imports of food and feed derived partially or entirely from GM sugar beets are allowed.

 

See also on GMO-Compass:

 

Further information:

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Messages 2012
May
Messages 2011
January
March 17, 2010 [nach oben springen]

© 2012 by GMO Compass. All rights reserved. | Imprint | website created by webmotive